🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 772+ reviews
Womenāœ“ In StockšŸ”„ Bestseller 

SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…4.2 out of 5(772 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$36
$60
Sale
āœ“ no-cost delivery on this item • Limited time offer

Sport : Training & Fitness, tennisWaistband : ElasticatedRise : HighPattern : PlainDetails : Elasticated waistArticle number : BJ241E0IC-O11

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt dispatch
ā†©ļø
straightforward Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac

Sport : Training & Fitness, tennis
Waistband : Elasticated
Rise : High
Pattern : Plain
Details : Elasticated waist
Article number : BJ241E0IC-O11

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1231428

Category: Women > Clothing > Trousers

Original Price:$60 USD

Sale Price:$36 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 distribution & Returns

āœ“ at no charge delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 772 reviews
CE​
Christina Evans āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Five Stars for SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac
Honestly, the SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac feels solid and it meets expectations. No setup issues.
NH
Nicole Harris āœ“ Verified
1 week ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
terrific Value for Money
The SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac is fine for me.
TM
Tyler Mitchell āœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly urge SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac
splendid value for money. The SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac quality is impressive.
BT
Brittany Turner āœ“ Verified 
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
treasure this SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac!
So far, the SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac works as described and I’m satisfied.
RS
Rachel Scott āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
fabulous Value for Money
In daily use, the SLEEK - Leggings - tarmac is elementary to use which is good enough.​