🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 994+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Slingback ballet pumps - tan

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(994 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$49​
$81.67
Sale
βœ“ no-cost distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Shoe tip : PointedHeel type : FlatFastening : Buckle/bowDetails : Elastic insert, rhinestonesOutsole : Non-slipArticle number : TA111A41F-B12

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy distribution

↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Slingback ballet pumps - tan

Shoe tip : Pointed
Heel type : Flat
Fastening : Buckle/bow
Details : Elastic insert, rhinestones
Outsole : Non-slip
Article number : TA111A41F-B12

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1666851

Category: Women > Shoes > Ballerinas

Original Price:$81.67 USD

Sale Price:$49 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 994 reviews
BT​
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent Value for Money
The Slingback ballet pumps - tan arrived in acceptable condition.
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent for Slingback ballet pumps - tan
To be fair, the Slingback ballet pumps - tan feels solid and it meets expectations.
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified
2 months ago

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five Stars for Slingback ballet pumps - tan
I wouldn’t call it astonishing, but the Slingback ballet pumps - tan is solid.
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified 
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore this Slingback ballet pumps - tan!
The Slingback ballet pumps - tan works normally.
KC​
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid Slingback ballet pumps - tan!
Personally, the Slingback ballet pumps - tan performs as expected and it works for me.